National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Winn

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 4, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-01140·Unknown

Opinion

NAT’L UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF No. 2:21-cv-1140-WBS-KJN PITTSBURGH PA, Plaintiff, (ECF Nos. 11, 19.) v. ROBERT WINN, Defendant.

On February 16, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 19), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within seven days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 19) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff is awarded final judgment in the amount of $267,355.54 in compensatory damages, $672 in costs, and prejudgment interest of $43.94/day from May 1, 2021, through the date of judgment; and 4. The clerk of the court is directed to close this case. Dated: March 4, 2022 44 4 , . ak. 1 / WILLIAMB.SHUBB □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Winn, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Winn (National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Winn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)