National Tube Co. v. Aiken
159 F. 1027
This text of 159 F. 1027 (National Tube Co. v. Aiken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
National Tube Co. v. Aiken, 159 F. 1027 (6th Cir. 1907).
Opinion
Petition for Revision of Proceedings in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. J. Snowden Bell and James I. Kay, for petitioners. Christy & Christy, for respondent. No opinion. Petition denied. See 157 Fed. 691.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aiken v. National Tube Co.
157 F. 691 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
159 F. 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-tube-co-v-aiken-ca6-1907.