National Tube Co. v. Aiken
159 F. 1027
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in National Tube Co. v. Aiken. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 F. 254 →
Opinion
Petition for Revision of Proceedings in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. J. Snowden Bell and James I. Kay, for petitioners. Christy & Christy, for respondent. No opinion. Petition denied. See 157 Fed. 691.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Tube Co. v. Aiken, 159 F. 1027 (6th Cir. 1907).
159 F. 1027 (National Tube Co. v. Aiken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aiken v. National Tube Co.
157 F. 691 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1907)