National Treasury Employees Union v. Russell Vought

D.C. Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Russell Vought

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 2025

Docket25-5091

StatusPublished

This text of National Treasury Employees Union v. Russell Vought (National Treasury Employees Union v. Russell Vought) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Treasury Employees Union v. Russell Vought, (D.C. Cir. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5091 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00381-ABJ Filed On: April 3, 2025 National Treasury Employees Union, et al.,

Appellees

v.

Russell T. Vought, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,

Appellants

BEFORE: Pillard, Katsas, and Rao, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of the emergency motion for administrative stay and stay pending appeal, and in light of appellants’ representations that, absent congressional action, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will remain open and will perform its legally required functions, it is

ORDERED that the district court’s order filed March 28, 2025 granting appellees’ motion for preliminary injunction be administratively stayed pending further order of the court, except insofar as the order gives effect to the terms memorialized in the parties’ March 12 agreement concerning contract terminations (ECF No. 71) and the parties’ February 14 agreement concerning records, terminations, and funding (ECF No. 19). The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 33 (2024).

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk

BY: /s/ Laura M. Morgan Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5091 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00381-ABJ Filed On: April 3, 2025 National Treasury Employees Union, et al.,

Appellees

v.

Russell T. Vought, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,

Appellants

BEFORE: Pillard, Katsas, and Rao, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of the emergency motion for administrative stay and stay pending appeal, and in light of appellants’ representations that, absent congressional action, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will remain open and will perform its legally required functions, it is

ORDERED that the district court’s order filed March 28, 2025 granting appellees’ motion for preliminary injunction be administratively stayed pending further order of the court, except insofar as the order gives effect to the terms memorialized in the parties’ March 12 agreement concerning contract terminations (ECF No. 71) and the parties’ February 14 agreement concerning records, terminations, and funding (ECF No. 19). The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 33 (2024).

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk

BY: /s/ Laura M. Morgan Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

National Treasury Employees Union v. Russell Vought, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-treasury-employees-union-v-russell-vought-cadc-2025.