NATIONAL TAX ASSISTANCE CORPORATION v. Washington

163 S.W.3d 519, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 678
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 2005·No. ED 84945·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Emanuel Washington, acting pro se, appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on plaintiffs ejectment action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant’s brief is denied as moot. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NATIONAL TAX ASSISTANCE CORPORATION v. Washington, 163 S.W.3d 519, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 678 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

163 S.W.3d 519 (NATIONAL TAX ASSISTANCE CORPORATION v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Family Support Division v. Stovall-Reid
163 S.W.3d 519 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)