National Survival Game of New York, Inc. v. NSG of LI Corp.

169 A.D.2d 760, 565 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 927
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 169 A.D.2d 760 (National Survival Game of New York, Inc. v. NSG of LI Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Survival Game of New York, Inc. v. NSG of LI Corp., 169 A.D.2d 760, 565 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), entered March 6, 1989, as (1) is in favor of the defendants John Cuocco, Michael Cuocco and American Air Gun Games, Inc., (2) denied the [761]*761plaintiff injunctive relief, and (3) is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, NSG of LI Corp., in the principal sum of only $145,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

By the terms of an agreement entered into by the plaintiff and defendants NSG of LI Corp. (hereinafter NSG) and Michael Cuocco, Michael Cuocco was barred from competing with NSG for two years following termination of their business agreement. Since John Cuocco and his corporation, American Air Gun Games, Inc., were not parties to this agreement, they cannot be bound by it. Moreover, since the plaintiff terminated the agreement on October 28, 1985, its right to an injunction, under the plain wording of the contract, expired on October 28, 1987. Its application for an injunction to run from two years from the entry of judgment in 1989 was therefore properly denied.

There is nothing in the record to support the plaintiff’s contention on appeal that the court erred in limiting the damage award to the pretermination period, or in restricting liability to NSG. Nor is the amount awarded inadequate. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kalmon Dolgin Affiliates, Inc. v. Tonacchio
110 A.D.3d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Kopelowitz & Co. v. Mann
83 A.D.3d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Pacific Carlton Development Corp. v. 752 Pacific, LLC
62 A.D.3d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1181 v. City of New York
45 A.D.3d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Manhattan Real Estate Equities Group LLC v. Pine Equity NY, Inc.
27 A.D.3d 323 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Seneca Beverage Corp. v. HealthNow New York, Inc.
383 F. Supp. 2d 413 (W.D. New York, 2005)
American Legacy Foundation v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.
831 A.2d 335 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 2003)
HDR, Inc. v. International Aircraft Parts, Inc.
257 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
W. H. Brownyard Corp. v. American International Group, Inc.
237 A.D.2d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A.D.2d 760, 565 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-survival-game-of-new-york-inc-v-nsg-of-li-corp-nyappdiv-1991.