National Surety Corp. v. M. Parisi & Son Construction Co.

239 A.D.2d 396, 658 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5094
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 12, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover insurance premiums allegedly owed, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Le-Vine, J.), dated March 15, 1996, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that there is an issue of fact as to whether the general release executed in conjunction with the settlement of a prior action was intended to cover the subject matter of this action (see, Structural Processing Corp. v Farboil Co., 234 AD2d 284; Lefrak SBN Assocs. v Kennedy Galleries, 203 AD2d 256; Perritano v Town of Mamaroneck, 126 AD2d 623). Miller, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Surety Corp. v. M. Parisi & Son Construction Co., 239 A.D.2d 396, 658 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

239 A.D.2d 396 (National Surety Corp. v. M. Parisi & Son Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Friends of Avalon Preparatory School, Inc. v. Ehrenfeld
6 A.D.3d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Grab v. Jewish Ass'n for Services for Aging
254 A.D.2d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Broderick v. Cohen
253 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)