National Surety Corp. v. Federal Reserve Bank

161 Misc. 308, 292 N.Y.S. 611, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1603
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in National Surety Corp. v. Federal Reserve Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 Misc. 304
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 31, 1936·Published

Opinion

Steuer, J.

In this action the First National Bank of Boston was allowed to implead as a defendant by stipulation. It now wishes to assert a claim over against the plaintiff. It acknowledges that this cannot be done under the existing status of the parties to the action. It, therefore, seeks to join plaintiff as a defendant in the action. For several reasons this procedure cannot be allowed. Primarily, one already a party to an action cannot be again joined as a party. Secondly, in the view of the court and in accordance with the motion decided herewith (161 Misc. 304), the claim does not state a cause of action. . Lastly, the anomalous situation complained of by the moving party is soluble by another method. The impleaded defendant may start an action against the plaintiff and then apply either to have the actions consolidated or tried together. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Surety Corp. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 161 Misc. 308, 292 N.Y.S. 611, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1603 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1936).

161 Misc. 308 (National Surety Corp. v. Federal Reserve Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Surety Corp. v. Federal Reserve Bank
161 Misc. 304 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)