National Steel Erection v. Hinkle

Indiana Court of Appeals

National Steel Erection v. Hinkle

553 N.E.2d 1252, 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 634, 1990 WL 66234

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 16, 1990

DocketNo. 63A04-8711-CV-338

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 553 N.E.2d 1252 (National Steel Erection v. Hinkle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Steel Erection v. Hinkle, 553 N.E.2d 1252, 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 634, 1990 WL 66234 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

MILLER, Judge.

In National Steel Erection v. Hinkle (1989), Ind.App., 541 N.E.2d 288, a negligence action, we reversed and remanded for new trial because of an incorrect instruction involving the liability portion of the trial. Both parties have filed for rehearing. Hinkle asserts inter alia that no issue was raised concerning the amount of damages awarded by the jury, and therefore, the new trial should be limited to liability.

In their brief in opposition to Hinkle’s petition for rehearing, National Steel Erection stipulates that the new trial should be limited to liability. We agree and grant rehearing to clarify that the new trial is to be limited to liability.

The parties’ other contentions were addressed in our opinion, and we will not address them again.

SHIELDS, P.J., and CONOVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI