National States Electric Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

National States Electric Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America

123 A.D.2d 424, 506 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60182

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.2d 424 (National States Electric Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National States Electric Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 123 A.D.2d 424, 506 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract (action No. 1), and an action to recover the balance of payment for goods sold and delivered (action No. 2), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated November 6, 1985, which granted the motion of National States Electric Corporation for leave to serve an amended complaint in action No. 1 and for a joint trial of action No. 2 with action No. 1.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The appellants in action No. 1 have not alleged any actual prejudice resulting from the proposed amendment to the complaint sufficient to justify the denial of the respondent’s motion to amend the complaint (see, Sentry Ins. Co. v KeroSun, Inc., 122 AD2d 204). In view of the fact that the two actions pending between the parties are based on common questions of law and fact, a joint trial is warranted (see, Matter of Vigo S. S. Corp. [Marship Corp.], 26 NY2d 157, cert denied sub nom. Snare Corp. v Vigo S. S. Corp., 400 US 819). Accordingly, Special Term properly granted the respondent’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint, and properly directed a joint trial of the two actions. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract (action No. 1), and an action to recover the balance of payment for goods sold and delivered (action No. 2), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated November 6, 1985, which granted the motion of National States Electric Corporation for leave to serve an amended complaint in action No. 1 and for a joint trial of action No. 2 with action No. 1.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The appellants in action No. 1 have not alleged any actual prejudice resulting from the proposed amendment to the complaint sufficient to justify the denial of the respondent’s motion to amend the complaint (see, Sentry Ins. Co. v KeroSun, Inc., 122 AD2d 204). In view of the fact that the two actions pending between the parties are based on common questions of law and fact, a joint trial is warranted (see, Matter of Vigo S. S. Corp. [Marship Corp.], 26 NY2d 157, cert denied sub nom. Snare Corp. v Vigo S. S. Corp., 400 US 819). Accordingly, Special Term properly granted the respondent’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint, and properly directed a joint trial of the two actions. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.2d 424, 506 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-states-electric-corp-v-insurance-co-of-north-america-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack