National Shawmut Bank v. City of Boston

First Circuit

National Shawmut Bank v. City of Boston

7 F.2d 1020, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3690

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedOctober 20, 1925

DocketNo. 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 7 F.2d 1020 (National Shawmut Bank v. City of Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Shawmut Bank v. City of Boston, 7 F.2d 1020, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3690 (1st Cir. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the same case that was previously before this court, in which we rendered an opinion July 15, 1924. 300 F. 29. Since then the plaintiff’s declaration has been amended in the District Court as to all the counts, except those upon the accounts annexed, and the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss and a demurrer thereto. The District Court has granted the motion to dismiss as to the counts on the accounts annexed and sustained the demurrer to the remaining counts. We see no-reason for changing our views as to the questions decided in our opinion of July 15, 1924. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed, with costs to the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the same case that was previously before this court, in which we rendered an opinion July 15, 1924. 300 F. 29. Since then the plaintiff’s declaration has been amended in the District Court as to all the counts, except those upon the accounts annexed, and the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss and a demurrer thereto. The District Court has granted the motion to dismiss as to the counts on the accounts annexed and sustained the demurrer to the remaining counts. We see no-reason for changing our views as to the questions decided in our opinion of July 15, 1924. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed, with costs to the defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 F.2d 1020, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-shawmut-bank-v-city-of-boston-ca1-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack