National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan
731 N.W.2d 405, 478 Mich. 862
Opinion
NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK, INC., Becky Allen, Dorthea Agnostopoulos, Adnan Ayoub, Meghan Bellanger, Judith Block, Mary M. Brisbois, Wade Carlson, Courtney D. Chapin, Michael Chapman, Michelle Corwin, Lori Curry, Joseph Darby, Scott Dennis, Jim Etzkorn, Jill Fuller, Susan Halsey-Ceragh, Peter Hammer, Debra Harrah, Ty Hiither, Jolinda Jach, Terry Korreck, Craig Kukuk, Gary Lindsay, Kevin McMann, A.T. Miller, Kitty O'Neil, Dennis Patrick, Tom Patrick, Gregg Pizzi, Kathleen Poelker, Jerome Post, Barbara Ramber, Paul Renwick, Dahlia Schwartz, Alexandra Stern, Gwen Stokes, Ken Cyberski, Joanne Beemon, Carol Borgeson, Michael Falk, and Matt Scott, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellant, and
City of Kalamazoo, Defendant-Appellee, and
Attorney General, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED.
Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan, 731 N.W.2d 405, 478 Mich. 862 (Mich. 2007).
731 N.W.2d 405 (National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Pride at Work, Inc v. Governor
748 N.W.2d 524 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)
Rohde v. Ann Arbor Public Schools
737 N.W.2d 158 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
People v. Phaneuf
731 N.W.2d 405 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)