National Preferred Risks, Inc. v. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

National Preferred Risks, Inc. v. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc.

78 A.D.2d 850, 434 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13544

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 850 (National Preferred Risks, Inc. v. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Preferred Risks, Inc. v. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc., 78 A.D.2d 850, 434 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover a sum of money representing premiums due on certain insurance policies, defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 26,1979, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion to confirm a referees report that recommended plaintiff have judgment in the principal sum of $60,694.99, (2) the judgment entered thereon on December 4,1979, and (3) a further judgment of the same court, entered January 4,1980, which directed defendants to pay the referees fee. Appeal from the order dismissed (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgments affirmed. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. There was a mutual, open and current account between the parties (see Minion v Warner, 238 NY 413; Green v Disbrow, 79 NY 1). Therefore, the action was not barred by the Statute of Limitations (see CPLR 206, subd [d]). We have considered defendants other points and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a sum of money representing premiums due on certain insurance policies, defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 26,1979, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion to confirm a referees report that recommended plaintiff have judgment in the principal sum of $60,694.99, (2) the judgment entered thereon on December 4,1979, and (3) a further judgment of the same court, entered January 4,1980, which directed defendants to pay the referees fee. Appeal from the order dismissed (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgments affirmed. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. There was a mutual, open and current account between the parties (see Minion v Warner, 238 NY 413; Green v Disbrow, 79 NY 1). Therefore, the action was not barred by the Statute of Limitations (see CPLR 206, subd [d]). We have considered defendants other points and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 850, 434 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-preferred-risks-inc-v-s-s-silberblatt-inc-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack