National Mines Corp. v. Conn

767 F.2d 921, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14319, 1985 WL 13418
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 1985
Docket84-3494
StatusUnpublished

This text of 767 F.2d 921 (National Mines Corp. v. Conn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Mines Corp. v. Conn, 767 F.2d 921, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14319, 1985 WL 13418 (6th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

767 F.2d 921

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
NATIONAL MINES CORPORATION; OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE
COMPANIES, PETITIONERS,
v.
JAMES CONN. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;
BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, RESPONDENTS.

NO. 84-3494

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

6/13/85

Ben.Rev.Bd.

VACATED AND REMANDED

ORDER

BEFORE: KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges; and RUBIN, District Judge.*

Petitioners are seeking review of a Benefits Review Board decision awarding black lung benefits to claimant-respondent James Conn. The only issue presented for review is whether the Board erred in ordering petitioners to pay interest on the awards as of the original date of claimant's eligibility for benefits. Petitioners have filed a motion to remand, arguing that the decision of this Court in Gibraltar Coal Co. v. Haskins, 749 F.2d 367 (6th Cir. 1984), requires vacating the Board's order for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. The Court notes that respondents have failed to respond to petitioners' motion.

Upon consideration, petitioners' motion appears to be well-taken and the Court agrees that oral argument is not necessary. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Rule 9(d)(4), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the motion to remand be and it hereby is granted. The case is hereby remanded to the Benefits Review Board with the directions that its order with respect to interest be vacated insofar as it awards interest for the period prior to 30 days from the date of initial determination of entitlement in the case.

*

The Honorable Carl B. Rubin, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibraltar Coal Co. v. Haskins
749 F.2d 367 (Sixth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
767 F.2d 921, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14319, 1985 WL 13418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-mines-corp-v-conn-ca6-1985.