National Mines Co. v. Charleston Hill Nat. Mining Syndicate

205 F. 787, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 970
CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedOctober 26, 1912
DocketNo. 1,185
StatusPublished

This text of 205 F. 787 (National Mines Co. v. Charleston Hill Nat. Mining Syndicate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Mines Co. v. Charleston Hill Nat. Mining Syndicate, 205 F. 787, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 970 (D. Nev. 1912).

Opinion

FARRINGTON, District Judge.

This action wa’s originally brought against the Charleston Hill National Mining Syndicate and the Mammoth National Mines Company. The Mammoth has defaulted; hence, wherever the term "defendant” is used in this opinion, it will be understood as referring to the Charleston Hill National Mining Syndicate alone.

Complainant owns the West Virginia, the Charleston, and the Charlestoxr Fraction. Defendant owns the West Virginia No. 1 and the Charleston No. 1. The West Virginia Fraction lies between the West Virginia and the West Virginia No. 1; otherwise it is of no interest in this suit. The six claims are located about north 33° west, and occupy a tract of land some 2,904 feet long, varying from 1,100 to a little more than 1,200 feet in width. The West Virginia and the Charleston, on the east side of the tract, are separated fx-orn the West Virginia No. 1 and the Charleston No. 1 on the west side by a strip of ground which has its greatest width, 39 feet, at the south end’of the tract’, and extends to the north 1,840 feet. From that point the Charleston and the Charleston No. 1 have for 1,079.78 feet, and to the north exid of the tract, a common side line. The Charleston Fraction occupies the north 1,088.8 feet of the stxip, and the West Virginia Fraction the south 751.2 feet; the two claims have a coxnmon end line. The north end line of the West Virginia and the south end line of the Charleston are identical. The saxne is true of the north end line of the West Virginia No. 1 and the south end line of the Charleston No. 1. The properties are situated on the western slope of the mountains to the east of Quinn River Valley, in National Mining District, Humboldt county, Nev.

Valuable mineral in place was discovered first on the West Virginia No. 1. That claim was therefore the earliest valid location.

In the bill it is alleged that the National vein at its top or apex, and on its strike, traverses the West Virginia from end to end, crossing both end lines; that it dips in a westerly direction, and in its downward course passes beyond the west side line of that-claim, and beneath the [789]*789surface of the Charleston Fraction, to and across the west side line thereof, and continuing in its downward course passes beneath the surface of the West Virginia No. 1, the Charleston No. 1, and the West Virginia Fraction.

The answer denies that there is any vein in the West Virginia, the top or apex of which lies wholly within the side lines of that claim; denies that there is any vein within the West Virginia which traverses that claim from end to end, or crosses both or either end line thereof; denies that said alleged vein in its downward course passes beyond the west side line of the West Virginia and beneath the surface of the Charleston Fraction, the West Virginia No. 1, or the Charleston No. 1;' and denies that there is any vein, or any part of the apex of any vein, so situated with reference to the boundary lines of the West Virginia that any extralateral rights whatsoever can be lawfully predicated thereon. In brief, no extralateral rights attach to the ownership of the West Virginia, because the vein in its course crosses neither end line, and its apex is too broad to be wholly included within the side lines of that claim; and, finally, the vein in its downward course does not pass beneath the surface of defendant’s properties.

On the trial defendant contended that the West Virginia is traversed by more than one vein; that the workings do not follow a continuous fissure; that the first, which will be termed the “National vein,” after crossing the north end line of the West Virginia, proceeds on a course nearly due south more than one-third the length of that claim, and meets a second fissure, which will be termed “the fault,” coming on a strike of about north 30° west, across and from the south end line; that the fault has a much flatter dip than the National vein: that, wherever the National vein has butted against the fault, it has been cut through and sheared off in such manner as to leave at the line of cut-off, and against the lower side of the plane of the fault, an underground apex.

The mountain side on which the claims are located falls away rapidly toward the north, so much so that it has been possible to work the mines through a series of tunnels following each other down the dip of the vein toward the west, like steps. Between the portal of tunnel No. 5 and its south face, which is 600 feet beneath the surface, the distance in a straight line is less than 1,300 feet. Station 575 at the south end of the apex drift, 142 in tunnel No. 2, 146 in tunnel No. 3, 118 in tunnel No. 3%., 115 in tunnel No. 4, and 172 in the west drift of Mammoth No. 3 tunnel, fix approximately the line along which the National vein is bent or cut off as it descends into the earth. ■ This line will be termed the “break.”

If the dip and strike of the two fissures were constant, the contact would be a straight line to the deep. As it is, that line conforms to the convexities, concavities, and bends of the vein along its way. The upper end of this line, at station 575, near the surface is 574.6 feet from a vertical plane passing through the south end line of the West Virginia; it crosses under the east side line of the'West Virginia No. 1 at a point near station 118 on the 3y>. level, 572 feet from said plane, and at vertical depth of about 350 feet. The horizontal distance thus [790]*790covered by the vein on its dip between the two stations is more than 275 feet. Station 118 is some 4 or 5 feet within the exterior lines of defendant’s property: From station 575 to station 118, the line of cutoff is substantially parallel to the end lines. From station 118 to a point between the top of the Workman Raise and the floor of level 3through which it must pass if there .be such a cut-off, it is nearly parallel to the side line; approximately, the two arms form á right angle. The top of the Workman Raise is 108 feet south of station 118. If the west drift on the 3 level be extended on its present course 25 feet to the south, it will be directly above the top of the Workman Raise. If the Workman Raise be continued upward on its present course, it will cut the east drift on the 3% level a few feet south of station 132. Unfortunately the Workman Raise has not been connected with the 3% level; consequently it is impossible, conceding the existence, of the cut-off, to determine its precise location within the 40 feet of vertical space which separates the raise from the level. Mr. Boyle places it 10 feet above the Raise. In any event, if there be a line of cut-off, for 108 feet south of station 118 to a point 10 feet above the Workman Raise it is nearly level, and within defendant's side lines.

It is clear, and it is conceded, that complainant is entitled to extra-lateral rights between parallel vertical planes, one drawn through the south end line of the West Virginia, and the other through a point on the west side line of that claim 572 feet from its northwest corner. That portion of the National vein which is in dispute' lies south of both planes.

The questions to be decided are: Was the National vein sheared off by the fault; if so, is the underground apex of the vein within complainant’s lines, or within defendant’s lines?

These questions cannot be decided on the ground that witnesses are unworthy of belief. The only basis on which a fair decision can rest is on facts which have been established by the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 F. 787, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-mines-co-v-charleston-hill-nat-mining-syndicate-nvd-1912.