National Metropolitan Bank of Washington v. Doherty

160 F.2d 580, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 399, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2643
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 10, 1947·No. No. 9392·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court granted appellee’s motion to dismiss appellant’s complaint on the ground that it failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The question turned oh the interpretation of a contract. A majority of this court are of opinion that the District Court’s interpretation is correct. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Metropolitan Bank of Washington v. Doherty, 160 F.2d 580, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 399, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2643 (D.C. Cir. 1947).

160 F.2d 580 (National Metropolitan Bank of Washington v. Doherty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Metropolitan Bank of Washington v. United States
111 F. Supp. 422 (Court of Claims, 1953)