National Maritime Union v. Herzog

334 U.S. 854, 68 S. Ct. 1529, 92 L. Ed. 1776, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2757, 22 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2215
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 21, 1948·No. No. 808·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The decision of the statutory three-judge court is affirmed to the extent that it passes upon the validity of § 9 (f) and § 9 (g) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (61 Stat. 136, 143; 29 U. S. C. §§ 141, 159 (f) 159 (g), Supp. 1947). We do not find it necessary to [855] reach or consider the validity of § 9 (h).

William L. Standard and David Rein for appellants. Solicitor General Perlman for ap-pellees. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Maritime Union v. Herzog, 334 U.S. 854, 68 S. Ct. 1529, 92 L. Ed. 1776, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2757, 22 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2215 (1948).

334 U.S. 854 (National Maritime Union v. Herzog) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rose v. City of New Rochelle
19 Misc. 2d 599 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
Central Westchester Humane Society, Inc. v. Hilleboe
202 Misc. 881 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
Bailey v. Richardson
182 F.2d 46 (D.C. Circuit, 1950)
L'Hommedieu v. Board of Regents of the University
276 A.D.2d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
White v. Herzog
80 F. Supp. 407 (District of Columbia, 1948)
White v. Douds
80 F. Supp. 402 (S.D. New York, 1948)
Fay v. Douds
79 F. Supp. 582 (S.D. New York, 1948)
American Communications Ass'n C. I. O. v. Schauffler
80 F. Supp. 400 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1948)