National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Vaughan

33 So. 2d 101, 1947 La. App. LEXIS 581

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Vaughan. Read the opinion of the Court — 1947 La. App. LEXIS 536 →

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 30, 1947·No. No. 2953.·Published

Opinion

Apparently a part of the testimony of Dr. T.C. Oliver was misquoted in the original opinion handed down herein.32 So.2d 490. He was quoted as saying that he did not consider a duodenal ulcer an ailment of a serious nature, whereas it *Page 102 appears that, he said he did so consider it.

His opinion in that respect does not cause us to alter our views in the case as the issue on which it was decided was not governed by his testimony.

We have carefully considered all other points raised in the application and still feel that they were correctly disposed of.

Rehearing is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

His opinion in that respect does not cause us to alter our views in the case as the issue on which it was decided was not governed by his testimony.

We have carefully considered all other points raised in the application and still feel that they were correctly disposed of.

Rehearing is refused.

National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Vaughan, 33 So. 2d 101, 1947 La. App. LEXIS 581 (La. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

33 So. 2d 101 (National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Vaughan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Vaughan

32 So. 2d 490 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1947)

Opinion

Related