National Lead Co. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 352
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in National Lead Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Cust. Ct. 511
United States Customs Court·Decided September 9, 1954·No. No. 58365; protest 148834-K (Buffalo)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of zinc the same in all material respects as that passed upon in M. W. Zack Metal Company v. United States (26 Cust. Ct. 91, C. D. 1306), which the court held to be classifiable under paragraph 397 as articles in chief value of zinc, not specially provided for. However, inasmuch as the plaintiff in the cited case did not claim classification under paragraph 397, the protest therein was overruled without affirming the collector’s classification. On the record presented herein, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Lead Co. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 352 (cusc 1954).

33 Cust. Ct. 352 (National Lead Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. United States
26 Cust. Ct. 91 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)