National Labor Relations Board v. Whitesell Corp.

385 F. App'x 613
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in National Labor Relations Board v. Whitesell Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 638 F.3d 883
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2010·No. 008-3291·Unpublished

Opinion

*614 PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”) has applied for enforcement of its order finding that Whitesell Corporation (“Whitesell”) violated various provisions of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 151-69, while negotiating a new collective-bargaining agreement with the Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics, and Allied Workers International Union, AFL-CIO. The Board’s order was entered by two members of a three-member group to which the Board delegated all its powers in December 2007 pursuant to section 3(b) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 153(b). When the order was entered on August 29, 2008, the five-member Board had only two members.

In New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 560 U.S. ——, 130 S.Ct. 2635, 177 L.Ed.2d 162 (2010), the Supreme Court held that a two-member group may not exercise delegated authority when the total Board membership falls below three because “the delegation clause [in section 3(b)] requires that a delegee group maintain a membership of three in order to exercise the delegated authority of the Board.” Id. at 2644-45 Accordingly, we deny the NLRB’s application for enforcement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Whitesell Corp., 385 F. App'x 613 (8th Cir. 2010).

385 F. App'x 613 (National Labor Relations Board v. Whitesell Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related