National Labor Relations Board v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co.

190 F.2d 556, 28 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2504, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 4208
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in National Labor Relations Board v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 F.2d 12
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 14, 1951·No. 13402_1·Published

Opinion

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

The Company complains that the Court did not expressly pass upon its contention that all of the unfair labor practices, except the discharge of seven employees for their union activities, were barred by limitation under Section 10(b) óf the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, U.S.C.A. Title 29, § 160(b). The sole ground for that contention, as expressed in the petition for rehearing, is that, “These other unfair labor practices have never been the subject of a charge to the Board”. In concluding that the Board had power to issue the complaint based on *557 such other alleged unfair labor practices, we held that the complaint merely “elaborated the charge with particularity.” It follows that none of the unfair labor practices charged in the complaint were barred by limitation.

The petition for rehearing is Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co., 190 F.2d 556, 28 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2504, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 4208 (5th Cir. 1951).

190 F.2d 556 (National Labor Relations Board v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Hunton
190 F.2d 556 (Second Circuit, 1951)