National Labor Relations Board v. Western Lace & Line Co

215 F.2d 453
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 1954
Docket13987_1
StatusPublished

This text of 215 F.2d 453 (National Labor Relations Board v. Western Lace & Line Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Western Lace & Line Co, 215 F.2d 453 (9th Cir. 1954).

Opinion

215 F.2d 453

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
WESTERN LACE & LINE CO.

No. 13987.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 17, 1954.

George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Ben Grodsky, Los Angeles, Cal., Frederick U. Reel, Robert H. Hunt, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Cecil W. Collins, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Western Lace failed to appear at the hearing of the petition. The findings of the Board are supported and the petition ordered granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 F.2d 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-western-lace-line-ca9-1954.