National Labor Relations Board v. Western Building Maintenance Co.

402 F.2d 775, 69 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2623, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5153
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 24, 1968·No. No. 22423·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Upon the record as a whole there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings that the Company and the Union jointly engaged in a hiring procedure whereby job applicants and newly hired employees were required to execute Union membership applications and dues checkoff authorizations prior to the expiration of the first 30 days of their employment.

The Board was not in error in concluding that by such conduct the Company and the Union violated section 8(a) (1), (2) and (3), and section 8(b) (2) and (1) (A) of the National Labor Relations Act, respectively, and the Company unlawfully assisted the Union in violation of section 8(a) (2) and (1) of the Act. NLRB v. Campbell Soup Company, 378 F.2d 259 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 900, 88 S.Ct. 220, 19 L.Ed.2d 217 (1967).

The Board order is entitled to enforcement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Western Building Maintenance Co., 402 F.2d 775, 69 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2623, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5153 (9th Cir. 1968).

402 F.2d 775 (National Labor Relations Board v. Western Building Maintenance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related