National Labor Relations Board v. V. E. Anderson Manufacturing Company

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. V. E. Anderson Manufacturing Company

443 F.2d 1175, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3040, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9278

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 28, 1971

Docket20922

StatusPublished

This text of 443 F.2d 1175 (National Labor Relations Board v. V. E. Anderson Manufacturing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. V. E. Anderson Manufacturing Company, 443 F.2d 1175, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3040, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9278 (6th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER.

'The Board petitions for enforcement of its order that respondent cease and desist from discriminatory activities against its employees; make whole certain employees for lost earnings; and post copies of a notice setting forth that *1176 respondent would not engage in activities against the union of the employees, and other activities of interference with union activities. The Board’s order was founded on evidence that such activities had been practiced by respondent. While the evidence of petitioner and respondent might be differently viewed, there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the findings of the Board. 184 NLRB No. 50.

Upon consideration of the briefs and of the entire record, it is ordered that enforcement of the order of the Board be and is hereby granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER.

'The Board petitions for enforcement of its order that respondent cease and desist from discriminatory activities against its employees; make whole certain employees for lost earnings; and post copies of a notice setting forth that *1176 respondent would not engage in activities against the union of the employees, and other activities of interference with union activities. The Board’s order was founded on evidence that such activities had been practiced by respondent. While the evidence of petitioner and respondent might be differently viewed, there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the findings of the Board. 184 NLRB No. 50.

Upon consideration of the briefs and of the entire record, it is ordered that enforcement of the order of the Board be and is hereby granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 F.2d 1175, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3040, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-v-e-anderson-manufacturing-company-ca6-1971.