National Labor Relations Board v. United Distillers of America, Limited

188 F.2d 353, 27 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2578, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3517
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 1951
Docket6239_1
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 188 F.2d 353 (National Labor Relations Board v. United Distillers of America, Limited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. United Distillers of America, Limited, 188 F.2d 353, 27 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2578, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3517 (4th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board which found an employer guilty of the discriminatory discharge of an employee on account of union activity and contained the usual cease and desist and reinstatement provisions. The contention of the employer was that the employee was rightfully discharged for violation of a rule forbidding union activities on the employer’s time and property; the contention of the Board, that he was discharged at the instance of the representative of one of the unions representing the employees at the plant because he was endeavoring to bring in a rival union. The question involved was a pure question of fact; and we cannot say that the findings of the Board are not supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. As we said in Hartsell Mills Co. v. N. L. R. B., 4 Cir., 111 F.2d 291, 293: “It must be remembered, in this connection, that the question involved *354 is a pure question of fact; that, in passing upon it, the Board may give consideration to circumstantial evidence as well as to that which is direct; that direct evidence of a purpose to violate the statute is rarely obtainable; and that where the finding of the Board is supported by circumstances from which the conclusion of discriminatory discharge may legitimately be drawn, it is binding upon the courts, as they are without power to find facts or to substitute their judgment for that of the Board.”

The order of the Board will be enforced.

Order enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Labor Relations Board v. Southland Mfg. Co.
201 F.2d 244 (Fourth Circuit, 1952)
National Labor Relations Board v. Nabors
196 F.2d 272 (Fifth Circuit, 1952)
National Labor Relations Board v. English Mica Co.
195 F.2d 986 (Fourth Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 F.2d 353, 27 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2578, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-united-distillers-of-america-limited-ca4-1951.