National Labor Relations Board v. United Aircraft Corporation (Pratt & Whitney and Hamilton Standard Divisions)

300 F.2d 442, 49 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3042, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5461
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 5, 1962·No. 27360·Published

Opinion

300 F.2d 442

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
UNITED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION (PRATT & WHITNEY AND HAMILTON STANDARD DIVISIONS) et al., Respondents-Appellants.

No. 305.

Docket 27360.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 5, 1962.

Decided April 5, 1962.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; T. Emmet Clarie, Judge.

Joseph C. Wells, of Reilly & Wells, Washington, D. C., for respondents-appellants.

Stephen B. Goldberg, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marion L. Griffin, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner-appellee.

Before CLARK, FRIENDLY and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed in open court on the opinion of District Judge Clarie, D.C.Conn., 200 F.Supp. 48.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. United Aircraft Corporation (Pratt & Whitney and Hamilton Standard Divisions), 300 F.2d 442, 49 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3042, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5461 (2d Cir. 1962).

300 F.2d 442 (National Labor Relations Board v. United Aircraft Corporation (Pratt & Whitney and Hamilton Standard Divisions)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related