National Labor Relations Board v. Twin Cities Electric Big G Electric & Engineering, Inc.

907 F.2d 108, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2728, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10940
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 2, 1990·No. 89-70489·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The court is informed that respondent Twin Cities Electric has petitioned for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Twin Cities Electric asserts that continuation of this enforcement action is automatically stayed as to it pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). However, the filing of a bankruptcy petition does not bar or stay an enforcement proceeding instituted by the National Labor Relations Board. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4), (5) (West 1979); NLRB v. Evans Plumbing Co., 639 F.2d 291, 293 (5th Cir.1981). Accordingly, this appeal is ready for calendaring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Twin Cities Electric Big G Electric & Engineering, Inc., 907 F.2d 108, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2728, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10940 (9th Cir. 1990).

907 F.2d 108 (National Labor Relations Board v. Twin Cities Electric Big G Electric & Engineering, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related