National Labor Relations Board v. Tri-State Carpenters & Joiners District Council

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Tri-State Carpenters & Joiners District Council

661 F.2d 583, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2053, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16862

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 15, 1981

Docket81-1147

StatusPublished

This text of 661 F.2d 583 (National Labor Relations Board v. Tri-State Carpenters & Joiners District Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Tri-State Carpenters & Joiners District Council, 661 F.2d 583, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2053, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16862 (6th Cir. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This cause is before the court on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order issued on July 23, 1980, against Tri-State Carpenters & Joiners District Council (“the Council”). The Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 250 NLRB No. 125, and was submitted to the court on the briefs and record and without oral argument.

Upon consideration, it is our opinion that the order of the Board which found that the Council violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by discharging Betty Newton was supported by substantial evidence as she was engaged in union and other concerted, protected activities.

It is therefore ORDERED that the order of the Board be and it is hereby enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This cause is before the court on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order issued on July 23, 1980, against Tri-State Carpenters & Joiners District Council (“the Council”). The Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 250 NLRB No. 125, and was submitted to the court on the briefs and record and without oral argument.

Upon consideration, it is our opinion that the order of the Board which found that the Council violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by discharging Betty Newton was supported by substantial evidence as she was engaged in union and other concerted, protected activities.

It is therefore ORDERED that the order of the Board be and it is hereby enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

661 F.2d 583, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2053, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-tri-state-carpenters-joiners-district-ca6-1981.