National Labor Relations Board v. Tonkawa Refining Company

434 F.2d 1041, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5863
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided December 22, 1970·No. 111-70·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its remedial order premised on a finding that respondent violated section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by announcing and granting wage increases in order to induce employees to reject the designation of a union as a bargaining agent in a pending representation election. The Board Decision and Order is found at 175 NLRB No. 102. From our review of the record we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board finding and hold that its remedial order is not abusively broad.

Enforcement will be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Tonkawa Refining Company, 434 F.2d 1041, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5863 (10th Cir. 1970).

434 F.2d 1041 (National Labor Relations Board v. Tonkawa Refining Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related