National Labor Relations Board v. Threads, Incorporated

Fourth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Threads, Incorporated

289 F.2d 483, 48 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2059, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4807

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 1961

Docket8346_1

StatusPublished

This text of 289 F.2d 483 (National Labor Relations Board v. Threads, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Threads, Incorporated, 289 F.2d 483, 48 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2059, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4807 (4th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

289 F.2d 483

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
THREADS, INCORPORATED, Respondent.

No. 8346.

United states Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 14, 1961.
Decided April 14, 1961.

Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

J. W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C., for respondent.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On this application of the National Labor Relations Board for a decree enforcing its order against Threads, Incorporated, it was represented to us by the attorney for that company that certain provisions in the Board's order had already been complied with, and that compliance with the remaining provisions will be had upon the determination by the Board of the wages due certain employes. We need not consider to what extent there has been compliance for, in the nature of the matter, enforcement of the Board's order will be effective only to the extent that compliance has not been completed. We perceive in this no reason for modifying the proposed decree, which is in the usual form, especially as the Examiner's recommended order, which was adopted by the Board, was not excepted to by Threads, Incorporated.

Enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

289 F.2d 483

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
THREADS, INCORPORATED, Respondent.

No. 8346.

United states Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 14, 1961.
Decided April 14, 1961.

Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

J. W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C., for respondent.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On this application of the National Labor Relations Board for a decree enforcing its order against Threads, Incorporated, it was represented to us by the attorney for that company that certain provisions in the Board's order had already been complied with, and that compliance with the remaining provisions will be had upon the determination by the Board of the wages due certain employes. We need not consider to what extent there has been compliance for, in the nature of the matter, enforcement of the Board's order will be effective only to the extent that compliance has not been completed. We perceive in this no reason for modifying the proposed decree, which is in the usual form, especially as the Examiner's recommended order, which was adopted by the Board, was not excepted to by Threads, Incorporated.

Enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 F.2d 483, 48 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2059, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-threads-incorporated-ca4-1961.