National Labor Relations Board v. The Everite Door Corp.

Third Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. The Everite Door Corp.

417 F.2d 180, 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2879, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10092

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 10, 1969·No. 17795_1·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned for the enforcement of its decision and order 1 against respondent, The Everite Door Corp. The Board found that the company violated § 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by interfering with, restraining, and coercing its employees in the exercise of their § 7 rights to organize, join and assist labor organizations, and also violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act by transferring an employee named Snyder from his job and later terminating his employment in order to discourage union membership and activity.

The company’s challenge to the Board’s decision and order ultimately rests upon the sufficiency of the evidence which was before the Board and its Trial Examiner.

On consideration of the record as a whole, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings. We shall accordingly grant enforcement of its order.

1

. 171 N.L.R.B. No. 8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned for the enforcement of its decision and order 1 against respondent, The Everite Door Corp. The Board found that the company violated § 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by interfering with, restraining, and coercing its employees in the exercise of their § 7 rights to organize, join and assist labor organizations, and also violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act by transferring an employee named Snyder from his job and later terminating his employment in order to discourage union membership and activity.

The company’s challenge to the Board’s decision and order ultimately rests upon the sufficiency of the evidence which was before the Board and its Trial Examiner.

On consideration of the record as a whole, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings. We shall accordingly grant enforcement of its order.

1

. 171 N.L.R.B. No. 8.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Everite Door Corp., 417 F.2d 180, 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2879, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10092 (3d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

417 F.2d 180 (National Labor Relations Board v. The Everite Door Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.