National Labor Relations Board v. Terry Industries, Incorporated

Fifth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Terry Industries, Incorporated

240 F.2d 188, 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2308, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4470

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 1957

Docket16152

StatusPublished

This text of 240 F.2d 188 (National Labor Relations Board v. Terry Industries, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Terry Industries, Incorporated, 240 F.2d 188, 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2308, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4470 (5th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In a decision reported at 113 N.L.R.B. 907, the Board found that respondent violated Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1, 3), by discharging seven named employees for union activity; and further violated Section 8(a) (1) by threats to reduce wages and to close the plant upon unionization, and by conditioning re-employment of the seven dischargees upon their signing a petition repudiating the union.

Respondent’s main insistence is that the testimony and inferences therefrom fail to support the findings. A careful review of the testimony, however, has convinced us that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, and that the order should be in all respects enforced. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456.

Enforcement granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In a decision reported at 113 N.L.R.B. 907, the Board found that respondent violated Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1, 3), by discharging seven named employees for union activity; and further violated Section 8(a) (1) by threats to reduce wages and to close the plant upon unionization, and by conditioning re-employment of the seven dischargees upon their signing a petition repudiating the union.

Respondent’s main insistence is that the testimony and inferences therefrom fail to support the findings. A careful review of the testimony, however, has convinced us that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, and that the order should be in all respects enforced. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456.

Enforcement granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 F.2d 188, 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2308, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-terry-industries-incorporated-ca5-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack