National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Plastics, Inc., Local 464, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Intervenor

525 F.2d 670
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1975
Docket73--1445
StatusPublished

This text of 525 F.2d 670 (National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Plastics, Inc., Local 464, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Plastics, Inc., Local 464, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Intervenor, 525 F.2d 670 (6th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

525 F.2d 670

91 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2240, 78 Lab.Cas. P 11,275

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
TENNESSEE PLASTICS, INC., Respondent.
Local 464, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Intervenor.

No. 73--1445.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 3, 1975.

Elliot Moore, Peter Nash, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., David Miller, John Irving, Walter C. Phillips, Director, Reg. 10, N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., John D. Burgoyne, Patrick Hardin, Julius Rosenbaum, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Anthony J. Leggio, Mitchell, Pate & Anderson, James W. Wimberly, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.

R. Jeffrey Bixler, Mulholland, Hickey & Lyman, Toledo, Ohio, for intervenor.

Before EDWARDS, CELEBREZZE and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case is before the Court upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its supplemental order issued against Respondent after proceedings pursuant to this Court's opinion of January 3, 1974, N.L.R.B. v. Tennessee Plastics, Inc., 489 F.2d 734. Following further fact finding the Board found that the Company violated the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to bargain with the Union.

Considering the record as a whole, we believe that there is substantial evidence to support the Board's findings, accordingly,

Enforcement of the Board's order is therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 F.2d 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-tennessee-plastics-inc-local-464-ca6-1975.