National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local Union No. 408

Third Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local Union No. 408

303 F.2d 444

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 16, 1962·No. No. 13747·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the National Labor Relations Board that we are asked to enforce in this case is, in technical contemplation, sufficiently supported by the evidence, though the apparently minimal [445]*445public or even private significance of the violation evokes wonder that so much has been made of so little. Since we have no authority to impose a rule de minimis upon the Board, the order will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order of the National Labor Relations Board that we are asked to enforce in this case is, in technical contemplation, sufficiently supported by the evidence, though the apparently minimal [445]*445public or even private significance of the violation evokes wonder that so much has been made of so little. Since we have no authority to impose a rule de minimis upon the Board, the order will be enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local Union No. 408, 303 F.2d 444 (3d Cir. 1962).

Pincite

303 F.2d 444 (National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local Union No. 408) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.