National Labor Relations Board v. Tak Trak, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Tak Trak, Inc.

293 F.2d 270, 48 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2855, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3794

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 1961

Docket17194

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 293 F.2d 270 (National Labor Relations Board v. Tak Trak, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Tak Trak, Inc., 293 F.2d 270, 48 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2855, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3794 (9th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter the Board) has petitioned this court for enforcement of its decree *271 directing respondent Tak Trak to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and to reinstate twenty-three named employees.

Respondent Tak Trak discharged its entire work force shortly after a majority of the workers had signed cards authorizing representation by Painters District Council No. 36 and Its Affiliated Unions, AFL-CIO (hereinafter the union).

The Board found that respondent had violated § 8(a) (1), (3) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., because of its coercive management tactics, because of the mass discharge, and because of a failure to bargain collectively with the union.

The sole question for decision is whether or not the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence. A careful examination of the record convinces us that they are.

The petition of the Board for enforcement of its decree is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI