National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Convalescent Hospital, Inc.

453 F.2d 748

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 23, 1972·No. 71-2061·Published

Opinion

453 F.2d 748

79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2671, 67 Lab.Cas. P 12,419

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
SUNSHINE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL, INC., Respondent.

No. 71-2061.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1972.
Rehearing Denied March 23, 1972.

Kacl Weiner (argued), Nancy M. Sher man, Eugene G. Goslee, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, for petitioner.

Edward B. Robin (argued), of Robin & Cohen, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS, CARTER and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Board's proposed order will be enforced. The Board will present a selfsufficient judgment or decree.

We find respondent's objections not well taken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

453 F.2d 748

79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2671, 67 Lab.Cas. P 12,419

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
SUNSHINE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL, INC., Respondent.

No. 71-2061.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1972.
Rehearing Denied March 23, 1972.

Kacl Weiner (argued), Nancy M. Sher man, Eugene G. Goslee, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, for petitioner.

Edward B. Robin (argued), of Robin & Cohen, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS, CARTER and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Board's proposed order will be enforced. The Board will present a selfsufficient judgment or decree.

We find respondent's objections not well taken.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Convalescent Hospital, Inc., 453 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

453 F.2d 748 (National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Convalescent Hospital, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.