National Labor Relations Board v. Stratford Lithographers, Inc.

Second Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Stratford Lithographers, Inc.

423 F.2d 1219, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2944, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10030

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 1, 1970

Docket34112_1

StatusPublished

This text of 423 F.2d 1219 (National Labor Relations Board v. Stratford Lithographers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Stratford Lithographers, Inc., 423 F.2d 1219, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2944, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10030 (2d Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order which, inter alia, requires respondent Stratford Lithographers, Inc., to bargain with Local 1, Amalgamated Lithographers of America, International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO, and to offer reinstatement to certain employees with back pay and other benefits. 168 N.L.R.B. No. 65 (1967). There was substantial evidence before the Board that respondent violated sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act by unlawfully interrogating employees concerning their union activities and attitudes, by offering or granting benefits to discourage union activities, by threatening losses to employees if they joined the union, by soliciting employees to deal directly with the company, and by instituting discriminatory dismissals, layoffs, transfers, salary increases and bonuses. There was also substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that the union represented a majority of the employees in the appropriate unit. We see no proper reason to set aside the Board’s determination that under the circumstances a bargaining order was necessary.

Enforcement granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order which, inter alia, requires respondent Stratford Lithographers, Inc., to bargain with Local 1, Amalgamated Lithographers of America, International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO, and to offer reinstatement to certain employees with back pay and other benefits. 168 N.L.R.B. No. 65 (1967). There was substantial evidence before the Board that respondent violated sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act by unlawfully interrogating employees concerning their union activities and attitudes, by offering or granting benefits to discourage union activities, by threatening losses to employees if they joined the union, by soliciting employees to deal directly with the company, and by instituting discriminatory dismissals, layoffs, transfers, salary increases and bonuses. There was also substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that the union represented a majority of the employees in the appropriate unit. We see no proper reason to set aside the Board’s determination that under the circumstances a bargaining order was necessary.

Enforcement granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

423 F.2d 1219, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2944, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-stratford-lithographers-inc-ca2-1970.