National Labor Relations Board v. Sport-Wear Hosiery Mills
This text of 134 F.2d 824 (National Labor Relations Board v. Sport-Wear Hosiery Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board.
The jurisdiction of the Board is conceded.
The Board found that respondent violated Sections 8(1) and 8(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (1 and 3), by the discriminatory discharge of its employees, Horace McConkey and A1 Roper, and by interfering with, restraining and coercing its employees in the exercise of their rights guaranteed in Sec. 7 of the Act, 49 Stat. 449, 29 U.S.C.A., § 151 et seq. We need not enter into a detailed discussion of the findings or the evidence upon which they were based. In this respect we are content to follow the procedure in N.L.R.B. v. Swift & Co. et al., 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 30, and cases there cited. An examination of the record discloses that the findings are supported by substantial evidence and we are not free to set them aside. N.L.R.B. v. Nevada Cons. Copper Corp., 316 U.S. 105, 62 S.Ct. 960, 86 L.Ed. 1305.
Enforcement of the order is decreed. See N.L.R.B. v. Bersted Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 738, amending the opinion in the same case in 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 409.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 F.2d 824, 12 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 798, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-sport-wear-hosiery-mills-ca6-1943.