National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Plasma Corporation

633 F.2d 1210, 106 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2241, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 21176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 1981
Docket79-2970
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 633 F.2d 1210 (National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Plasma Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Plasma Corporation, 633 F.2d 1210, 106 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2241, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 21176 (5th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner, the National Labor Relations Board requests that we reexamine the propriety of the following language appearing in the panel opinion:

The ALJ treated as a separate violation of §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) Gurley’s refusing to rehire Huguley in November of 1977, after the business reopened. At the outset, we must conclude that the ALJ’s decision is at least partially incorrect as a matter of law insofar as it finds that Gurley’s refusal to rehire Huguley violated § 8(a)(1). That section prohibits an employer’s interference with, or restraint or coercion of, employees’ § 7 rights, the right to engage in ‘concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection.’ Because, obviously, Huguley was no longer an employee when he reapplied, he is not protected by § 8(a)(1).

626 F.2d 1287, 1295 (5th Cir. 1980). We acknowledge our error in concluding that Huguley was not an “employee” for purposes of § 8(a)(1) protection at the time of his reapplication. See 29 U.S.C.A. § 152(3); N.L.R.B. v. Foodway of El Paso, 496 F.2d 117 (5th Cir. 1974); N.L.R.B. v. AcClang, Inc., 466 F.2d 558 (5th Cir. 1972); Bob’s Casing Crews, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 458 F.2d 1301 (5th Cir. 1972). To avoid further confusion, we delete and expunge from the opinion the aforementioned language. However, the result of the Board’s petition for enforcement remaining the same, we modify our opinion in this respect only and DENY the petition for rehearing.

REHEARING DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F.2d 1210, 106 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2241, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 21176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-southern-plasma-corporation-ca5-1981.