National Labor Relations Board v. Sir James, Inc.
446 F.2d 570, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3159, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8641
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 6, 1971·No. 26881_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The Board’s order will be enforced.
The early unilateral discontinuance of the health and welfare payments we conclude was an unfair labor practice. Hin-son v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 428 F.2d 133.
The finding that the company refused to bargain to an impasse is supported by the record considered as a whole.
THOMPSON, District Judge, dissents on the refusal to bargain issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Labor Relations Board v. Sir James, Inc., 446 F.2d 570, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3159, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8641 (9th Cir. 1971).
446 F.2d 570 (National Labor Relations Board v. Sir James, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner
632 F.2d 721 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 68, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
448 F.2d 1127 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)