Home/Ninth Circuit/National Labor Relations Board v. Sir James, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sir James, Inc.

446 F.2d 570, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3159, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8641
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 6, 1971
Docket26881_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 446 F.2d 570 (National Labor Relations Board v. Sir James, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Sir James, Inc., 446 F.2d 570, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3159, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8641 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Board’s order will be enforced.

The early unilateral discontinuance of the health and welfare payments we conclude was an unfair labor practice. Hin-son v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 428 F.2d 133.

The finding that the company refused to bargain to an impasse is supported by the record considered as a whole.

THOMPSON, District Judge, dissents on the refusal to bargain issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner
632 F.2d 721 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 68, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
448 F.2d 1127 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 F.2d 570, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3159, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-sir-james-inc-ca9-1971.