National Labor Relations Board v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, Salesmen, and Helpers Local 145, Etc

199 F.2d 709
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1952
Docket21713_1
StatusPublished

This text of 199 F.2d 709 (National Labor Relations Board v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, Salesmen, and Helpers Local 145, Etc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, Salesmen, and Helpers Local 145, Etc, 199 F.2d 709 (2d Cir. 1952).

Opinion

199 F.2d 709

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
SERVICE TRADE CHAUFFEURS, SALESMEN, AND HELPERS LOCAL 145, etc.

No. 9.

Docket 21713.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Submitted October 6, 1952.

Decided November 3, 1952.

A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Gordon, Fitzgerald & Riley, Hartford, Conn., for respondent.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The former petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order that the union cease picketing the secondary employer was referred back to the Board in order that it might determine whether the union had met the standards as to permissible picketing of a secondary employer which it had set up in the Sailors Union Case, 92 N.L.R.B. 547. N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, Salesmen & Helpers, Local 145, 2 Cir., 191 F.2d 65. Upon the foregoing remand the Board held that the above mentioned standards were not met. There was evidence that they were not met because the picketing instead of being limited to the time when trucks arrived, continued for extended periods thereafter. If there was any other fair interpretation of the facts the union could have offered evidence in support of its position, but it did not do so.

Enforcement of the order of the Board is accordingly granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 F.2d 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-service-trade-chauffeurs-salesmen-and-ca2-1952.