National Labor Relations Board v. Sandy Hill Iron & Brass Works

Second Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Sandy Hill Iron & Brass Works

145 F.2d 631, 15 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 659, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2593

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 22, 1944

DocketNo. 26

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 F.2d 631 (National Labor Relations Board v. Sandy Hill Iron & Brass Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Sandy Hill Iron & Brass Works, 145 F.2d 631, 15 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 659, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2593 (2d Cir. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER curiam:.

Based on findings that the respondent discriminatorily discharged three of its employees in violation of the Act, the Board made an order containing the usual “cease and desist” provisions and requiring certain affirmative action with respect to the discharged employees. In defense to the petition for enforcement the respondent asserts that the findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Counsel apparently misconceives the powers of the court in reviewing the findings. That we cannot consider the credibility of witnesses nor weigh the evidence is too firmly established to require the citation of authority. It will suffice to say that the record contains evidence sufficient to uphold the order. The petition for an order of enforcement is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER curiam:.

Based on findings that the respondent discriminatorily discharged three of its employees in violation of the Act, the Board made an order containing the usual “cease and desist” provisions and requiring certain affirmative action with respect to the discharged employees. In defense to the petition for enforcement the respondent asserts that the findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Counsel apparently misconceives the powers of the court in reviewing the findings. That we cannot consider the credibility of witnesses nor weigh the evidence is too firmly established to require the citation of authority. It will suffice to say that the record contains evidence sufficient to uphold the order. The petition for an order of enforcement is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 F.2d 631, 15 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 659, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-sandy-hill-iron-brass-works-ca2-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack