National Labor Relations Board v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company
This text of 313 F.2d 633 (National Labor Relations Board v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business as Clarion Fruit Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On review of the record we are of the opinion that the National Labor Relations Board has jurisdiction; that substantial evidence supports its findings that the respondents violated Section 8 (a) (1) and Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, and that the Board’s Order is valid and proper.
For the reasons stated the Board’s petition for enforcement will be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 F.2d 633, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-samuel-cherico-joseph-cherico-and-ca3-1963.