National Labor Relations Board v. Rudolph R. Zawadzki D/B/A Marla Security Service

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Rudolph R. Zawadzki D/B/A Marla Security Service

479 F.2d 1141, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9600, 72 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 14,098

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 5, 1973

Docket73-1194

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 479 F.2d 1141 (National Labor Relations Board v. Rudolph R. Zawadzki D/B/A Marla Security Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Rudolph R. Zawadzki D/B/A Marla Security Service, 479 F.2d 1141, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9600, 72 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 14,098 (6th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be considered on Petitioner’s application for the summary entry of judgment enforcing its Order of January 14, 1972 against Respondent, adopting with modification the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner’s decision and ordering appropriate relief thereunder. Respondent has filed no response to this application.

Upon review of the record filed with this Court by Petitioner it appears that Respondent failed to file timely objections to the Trial Examiner’s decision, as required under Section 10(c) of the Act and under Sections 102.46 and 102.48 of the Rules and Regulations of the National Labor Relations Board, Series 8. Respondent has failed to show this Court any extraordinary circumstances which might excuse this failure, and it is therefore precluded under Section 10 (c) of the Act from raising any objections to Petitioner’s Order before this Court.

It is therefore ordered that said application for summary entry of judgment enforcing Petitioner’s Order be and the same is hereby granted and that said Order be and the same is hereby enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be considered on Petitioner’s application for the summary entry of judgment enforcing its Order of January 14, 1972 against Respondent, adopting with modification the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner’s decision and ordering appropriate relief thereunder. Respondent has filed no response to this application.

Upon review of the record filed with this Court by Petitioner it appears that Respondent failed to file timely objections to the Trial Examiner’s decision, as required under Section 10(c) of the Act and under Sections 102.46 and 102.48 of the Rules and Regulations of the National Labor Relations Board, Series 8. Respondent has failed to show this Court any extraordinary circumstances which might excuse this failure, and it is therefore precluded under Section 10 (c) of the Act from raising any objections to Petitioner’s Order before this Court.

It is therefore ordered that said application for summary entry of judgment enforcing Petitioner’s Order be and the same is hereby granted and that said Order be and the same is hereby enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 F.2d 1141, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9600, 72 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 14,098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-rudolph-r-zawadzki-dba-marla-security-ca6-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack