National Labor Relations Board v. Rudolph B. Zawadzki D/B/A Maria Security Service

471 F.2d 612, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2976
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 31, 1973·No. 72-2086·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*613 ORDER

This cause came on to be considered on the Board’s application for summary-entry of judgment enforcing its order in the above-captioned case dated June 16, 1972, and reported at 197 N.L.R.B. No. 82.

Respondent failed to answer the unfair' labor practice charge filed before the Board as required by Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations, Series 8, as amended. Respondent likewise failed to file a response to the Board’s notice to show cause why the General'Counsel’s motion for summary judgment should not be granted.

Upon the record before us we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings. It is therefore ordered that the Board’s application for the entry of summary judgment be and is hereby granted and the Board’s order be and is hereby enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Rudolph B. Zawadzki D/B/A Maria Security Service, 471 F.2d 612, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2976 (6th Cir. 1973).

471 F.2d 612 (National Labor Relations Board v. Rudolph B. Zawadzki D/B/A Maria Security Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Labor Relations Board v. Strippers, Inc.
471 F.2d 612 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)