National Labor Relations Board v. Roscoe Wagner, Doing Business as Wagner Transportation Company

Ninth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Roscoe Wagner, Doing Business as Wagner Transportation Company

227 F.2d 200, 37 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2092, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4349

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 17, 1955·No. 14721_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on petition of the Board to enforce its order entered against respondent. The Board, following the report of its examiner, found that respondent violated § 8(a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (3), by discharging an employee named Weyer because of his membership in the Teamsters’ Union, and violated § 8(a) (1) by this and other conduct. The usual cease and desist order was entered, together with an order to make Weyer whole for loss of pay and to post appropriate notices.

The sole argument here has to do with the sufficiency of the evidence in support of the unfair practice charges. While the evidence was conflicting, there was abundant testimony, not inherently incredible, to support the Board’s findings on the point. Questions of credibility in such circumstances are for the examiner and the Board, not for us, to resolve.

A decree enforcing the order will be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on petition of the Board to enforce its order entered against respondent. The Board, following the report of its examiner, found that respondent violated § 8(a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (3), by discharging an employee named Weyer because of his membership in the Teamsters’ Union, and violated § 8(a) (1) by this and other conduct. The usual cease and desist order was entered, together with an order to make Weyer whole for loss of pay and to post appropriate notices.

The sole argument here has to do with the sufficiency of the evidence in support of the unfair practice charges. While the evidence was conflicting, there was abundant testimony, not inherently incredible, to support the Board’s findings on the point. Questions of credibility in such circumstances are for the examiner and the Board, not for us, to resolve.

A decree enforcing the order will be entered.

National Labor Relations Board v. Roscoe Wagner, Doing Business as Wagner Transportation Company, 227 F.2d 200, 37 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2092, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4349 (9th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

227 F.2d 200 (National Labor Relations Board v. Roscoe Wagner, Doing Business as Wagner Transportation Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related