National Labor Relations Board v. Robert E. Anderson and Richard E. Anderson, Copartners, D/B/A Anderson Cabinets

611 F.2d 1225, 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2103, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9848
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 1979
Docket79-1389
StatusPublished

This text of 611 F.2d 1225 (National Labor Relations Board v. Robert E. Anderson and Richard E. Anderson, Copartners, D/B/A Anderson Cabinets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Robert E. Anderson and Richard E. Anderson, Copartners, D/B/A Anderson Cabinets, 611 F.2d 1225, 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2103, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9848 (8th Cir. 1979).

Opinion

ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT

The National Labor Relations Board petitioned for the enforcement of its order against Robert E. Anderson and Richard E. Anderson, copartners, d/b/a Anderson Cabinets. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 241 NLRB No. 72,100 L.R.R.M. 1606 (1979). After a careful review of the record, we are convinced that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board’s finding that Robert Rhyneer was a supervisory employee and that the employer violated § 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(5), by preparing, circulating and filing a petition seeking to decertify the Carpenters *1226 District Council of Greater St. Louis, AFL-CIO, and by withdrawing recognition from the Carpenters in reliance upon this employer-sponsored petition.

There is also substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s finding that the Company violated § 8(a)(3) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(3), by discharging Floyd Wildhaber who participated in a strike of the Carpenters against the Company in protest of the unlawful withdrawal of recognition and that it violated § 8(a)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), by various acts of interference.

Accordingly, we enforce the Board’s order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(5)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
611 F.2d 1225, 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2103, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-robert-e-anderson-and-richard-e-ca8-1979.