National Labor Relations Board v. Republican Pub. Co.

First Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Republican Pub. Co.

174 F.2d 474, 24 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2052, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3367

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMay 12, 1949

DocketNo. 4408

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 174 F.2d 474 (National Labor Relations Board v. Republican Pub. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Republican Pub. Co., 174 F.2d 474, 24 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2052, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3367 (1st Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against respondents issued May 15, 1947. 73 N.L.R.B. 1085. See also 64 N.L.R.B. 869. Petitioner presented its case to us by brief and oral argument. Respondents submitted on the record, filed no brief, and were not represented .at the argument in this court. Under the circumstances, we do not deem it incumbent upon us to render an extended opinion. .We shall do no more than announce the conclusions we have arrived at upon examination of the record.

The factual basis for the Board’s jurisdiction is sufficiently shown. Under the somewhat unusual circumstances appearing, we agree with the finding and conclusion of the Board that each of the respondents is an employer within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. We sustain the Board’s findings as to the commission of unfair labor practices by respondents. In so far as questions relating to the remedy are now open to respondents in view of the restricted scope of their exceptions at the administrative level to the findings and recommendations of the Board’s trial examiner, we deem the terms of the order to be appropriate and within the authority of the Board.

A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against respondents issued May 15, 1947. 73 N.L.R.B. 1085. See also 64 N.L.R.B. 869. Petitioner presented its case to us by brief and oral argument. Respondents submitted on the record, filed no brief, and were not represented .at the argument in this court. Under the circumstances, we do not deem it incumbent upon us to render an extended opinion. .We shall do no more than announce the conclusions we have arrived at upon examination of the record.

The factual basis for the Board’s jurisdiction is sufficiently shown. Under the somewhat unusual circumstances appearing, we agree with the finding and conclusion of the Board that each of the respondents is an employer within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. We sustain the Board’s findings as to the commission of unfair labor practices by respondents. In so far as questions relating to the remedy are now open to respondents in view of the restricted scope of their exceptions at the administrative level to the findings and recommendations of the Board’s trial examiner, we deem the terms of the order to be appropriate and within the authority of the Board.

A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 F.2d 474, 24 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2052, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-republican-pub-co-ca1-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack