National Labor Relations Board v. Ranco, Inc.
This text of 222 F.2d 543 (National Labor Relations Board v. Ranco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order directing the respondent company to cease and desist from prohibiting the distribution of union literature by union representatives on the company’s parking lot, except pursuant to reasonable regulations or control of such character as not to deny them access to the company’s employees for the purpose of distributing such literature; and directing the respondent to rescind its plant rule concerning such distribution on its parking lot at its plant in Delaware, Ohio, except pursuant to reasonable regulations of such character as not to deny union representatives access to its employees for the purpose of distributing its literature;
And it appearing, upon a review of the record as a whole, that there is substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the board;
And it appearing further that, in our judgment, the board properly applied the principles of decisions in the following cases, N.L.R.B. v. Monarch Machine Tool Co., 6 Cir., 210 F.2d 183, 184-187, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 967, 74 S.Ct. 778, 98 L.Ed. 1109; N.L.R.B. v. Lake Superior Lumber Corp., 6 Cir., 167 F.2d 147, 150; N.L.R.B. v. Le Tourneau Co. of Georgia, 324 U.S. 793, 797, 798, 65 S.Ct. 982, 89 L.Ed. 1372;
The petition of the labor board for enforcement of its order is granted as prayed by it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 F.2d 543, 36 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2136, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-ranco-inc-ca6-1955.