National Labor Relations Board v. Queen City Coach Company

420 F.2d 1383, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2672, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10388
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 1970·No. 13705_1·Published

Opinion

420 F.2d 1383

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 13705.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 4, 1970.

Decided March 9, 1970.

On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner.

Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N. C. (Blakeney, Alexander & Machen, Charlotte, N. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Board's application for enforcement of its order and after hearing oral argument, the court is of the view that the order is well supported by the record as a whole.

The order is hereby enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Queen City Coach Company, 420 F.2d 1383, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2672, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10388 (4th Cir. 1970).

420 F.2d 1383 (National Labor Relations Board v. Queen City Coach Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.