National Labor Relations Board v. Queen City Coach Company
This text of 420 F.2d 1383 (National Labor Relations Board v. Queen City Coach Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
420 F.2d 1383
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 13705.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued March 4, 1970.
Decided March 9, 1970.
On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner.
Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N. C. (Blakeney, Alexander & Machen, Charlotte, N. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Upon consideration of the Board's application for enforcement of its order and after hearing oral argument, the court is of the view that the order is well supported by the record as a whole.
The order is hereby enforced.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F.2d 1383, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2672, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-queen-city-coach--ca4-1970.