National Labor Relations Board v. Quaker Mfg., Corp.

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Quaker Mfg., Corp.

574 F.2d 358, 98 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2934, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11659

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 1978

Docket76-2340

StatusPublished

This text of 574 F.2d 358 (National Labor Relations Board v. Quaker Mfg., Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Quaker Mfg., Corp., 574 F.2d 358, 98 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2934, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11659 (6th Cir. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case is before the court pursuant to a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the respondent, Quaker Manufacturing Corporation. The Board found violations of Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act due to the surveillance and interrogation of employees regarding union activities and the promulgation of a “no-dis *359 cussion” rule applicable solely to union topics. The Board further found that the company violated Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) in its discriminatory and coercive discharges of employees Roy Manypenny and Charles Marple. 224 N.L.R.B. No. 144 (1976).

Because we are of the opinion that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole,

IT IS ORDERED that the Board’s order be and is hereby enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case is before the court pursuant to a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the respondent, Quaker Manufacturing Corporation. The Board found violations of Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act due to the surveillance and interrogation of employees regarding union activities and the promulgation of a “no-dis *359 cussion” rule applicable solely to union topics. The Board further found that the company violated Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) in its discriminatory and coercive discharges of employees Roy Manypenny and Charles Marple. 224 N.L.R.B. No. 144 (1976).

Because we are of the opinion that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole,

IT IS ORDERED that the Board’s order be and is hereby enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

574 F.2d 358, 98 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2934, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-quaker-mfg-corp-ca6-1978.